| To: | herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [XFRM] Convert XFRM_MSG_* macros to an enum |
| From: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 03 Jul 2004 19:04:34 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | davem@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040703.190042.70899669.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> |
| Organization: | USAGI Project |
| References: | <20040703095215.GA16195@gondor.apana.org.au> <20040703.190042.70899669.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
To clarify: In article <20040703.190042.70899669.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Sat, 03 Jul 2004 19:00:42 +0900 (JST)), YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> says: > > I've cleaned up the existing MSG definitions by converting them to > > an enum. This should make future additions slightly easier in that > > XFRM_MSG_MAX won't have to be touched again. : > Well, I think we'd better to do > > #define XFRM_MSG_GETSA XFRM_MSG_GETSA > > etc. because this would break (future) applications which do > #ifdef. I meant, the change (without #define) would break (future) applications which do #ifdef. -- Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF 80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [XFRM] Convert XFRM_MSG_* macros to an enum, Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [XFRM] Convert XFRM_MSG_* macros to an enum, Herbert Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [XFRM] Convert XFRM_MSG_* macros to an enum, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [XFRM] Convert XFRM_MSG_* macros to an enum, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |