Re: [PATCH][ATM]: fix sparse checker warnings

[Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 04:26:41PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 15:52:30 -0700
> Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > > +++ b/net/atm/br2684.c    2004-06-22 14:04:02 -07:00
> > > @@ -562,7 +562,7 @@
> > >   atmvcc->push = br2684_push;
> > >   skb_queue_head_init(&copy);
> > >   skb_migrate(&atmvcc->sk->sk_receive_queue, &copy);
> > 
> > > - -       while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&copy))) {
> > > + while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&copy)) != NULL) {
> > 
> > I know it's a matter of style, but I really hate the 'assignment in
> > conditional' warning sparse spews out, especially when many people,
> > myself included really do write while ((a = b)) --- the extra
> > parentheses as a compromise to keep gcc quiet.
> 
> I think warning for the ((a=b)) case is annoying but not annoying
> enough to fight against it :)

FWIW I take a tangential position on the issue:

it causes a fuckton of code churn