netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: kiocb->private is too large for kiocb's on-stack

To: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: kiocb->private is too large for kiocb's on-stack
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 01:20:16 -0700
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040628011232.43acd3b8.akpm@osdl.org>
Mail-followup-to: William Lee Irwin III <wli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx
References: <20040628080801.GO21066@holomorphy.com> <20040628011232.43acd3b8.akpm@osdl.org>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:12:32AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> That's so much better than what we had before it ain't funny.
> Was this runtime tested?

Yes. Oracle exercises this, and it survives OAST.

I'll write a dedicated userspace testcase for the aio operations and
follow up with that.


-- wli

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>