| To: | Anton Blanchard <anton@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Allow IP header alignment to be overriden |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 15 Jun 2004 21:37:23 -0700 |
| Cc: | sfeldma@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, john.ronciak@xxxxxxxxx, ganesh.venkatesan@xxxxxxxxx, leonid.grossman@xxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040615233423.GC3228@krispykreme> |
| References: | <20040611012727.GA27672@krispykreme> <20040610223549.5e9ad025.davem@redhat.com> <1086939562.3657.10.camel@sfeldma-mobl2.dsl-verizon.net> <20040611142336.GE27672@krispykreme> <20040612111218.783f587d.davem@redhat.com> <20040615233423.GC3228@krispykreme> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 09:34:23 +1000 Anton Blanchard <anton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yes. Please add a paragraph to that comment explaining what "unaligned > > CPU cost" really means, ie. that the IP/TCP header members are going to > > be accessed with alignment less than the types might require on a given > > architecture. > > > > Then I'll apply this and we can start beating up the drivers. > > How does this look? The s2io, ixgb and e1000 drivers are converted. Works for me, applied. Thanks Anton. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: __user in atm.h, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Prism54-devel] Re: [Prism54] CVS -> bk tree update, Luis R. Rodriguez |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Allow IP header alignment to be overriden, Anton Blanchard |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Allow IP header alignment to be overriden, Anton Blanchard |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |