| To: | Ray Cole <ray_cole@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: r8169 driver in 2.6.6 |
| From: | Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 27 May 2004 09:25:36 +0200 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040526230632.26c4e2e5.ray_cole@earthlink.net>; from ray_cole@earthlink.net on Wed, May 26, 2004 at 11:06:32PM -0500 |
| References: | <20040525230831.4747005f.ray_cole@earthlink.net> <20040525231140.1325daa7.ray_cole@earthlink.net> <20040526055841.GH3330@ruslug.rutgers.edu> <20040526133645.B32639@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <20040526070014.17ee9486.ray_cole@earthlink.net> <20040526161508.A3368@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <20040526191528.54f4af59.ray_cole@earthlink.net> <20040526205324.0913df99.ray_cole@earthlink.net> <20040526221742.393e626d.ray_cole@earthlink.net> <20040526230632.26c4e2e5.ray_cole@earthlink.net> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
Ray Cole <ray_cole@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> : > It looks like it is most definately a gcc 2.95.3 issue. I turned off > optimization (appended -O0 to the compiler command line) and the 'bad' way > gives the proper result. -O1, on the other hand, gives an incorrect result. Would you be kind enough to send the two versions of the 2.6.6 r8169.o files compiled with 2.95.3: the unmodified one and the one with your minimal workaround ? -- Ueimor |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: r8169 driver in 2.6.6, Ray Cole |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Here is the document, vlan-owner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: r8169 driver in 2.6.6, Ray Cole |
| Next by Thread: | Re: r8169 driver in 2.6.6, Francois Romieu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |