| To: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Kernel BUG: Qos seg. fault |
| From: | Dmitry Torokhov <dtor_core@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 24 May 2004 14:53:46 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | Jaume Catarineu <jaume.catarineu@xxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> > Since TBF has only one child no matter what I contend that > > implementing filters for TBF does not make sense, filters should > > be attached either to TBF's child ot to TBF's parent but not to > > TBF itself. > > Ok, understood. Why does TBF have only one child? It just does... TBF as far as I understand is a simple rate limiting tool for your network link. I implemented the child qdisc for TBF so you can change default fifo queue in it to SFQ or PRIO. It supposed to be very lightweight. If you need something more complex/fancy then you probably want HTB or CBF. It's all just my opinion though. Dmitry |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Kernel BUG: Qos seg. fault, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Kernel BUG: Qos seg. fault, Jaume Catarineu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Kernel BUG: Qos seg. fault, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Kernel BUG: Qos seg. fault, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |