netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Prism54-devel] Re: TxDescriptors -> 1024 default. Please not for ev

To: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Prism54-devel] Re: TxDescriptors -> 1024 default. Please not for every NIC!
From: Tomasz Torcz <zdzichu@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 18:45:16 +0200
In-reply-to: <20040520163811.GA15832@bougret.hpl.hp.com>
References: <OF72607111.CD0234C8-ON85256DA1.0068861B-86256DA1.0068FF60@us.ibm.com> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0405151354220.9894@fcat> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0405190256010.30653@fcat> <20040519102700.GA16465@ee.oulu.fi> <20040520141111.GR13898@ruslug.rutgers.edu> <20040520163811.GA15832@bougret.hpl.hp.com>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 09:38:11AM -0700, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
>       I personally would stick with 100. The IrDA stack runs
> perfectly fine with 15 buffers at 4 Mb/s. If 100 is not enough, I
> think the problem is not the number of buffers, but somewhere else.

 I don't know how much trollish or true is that comment:
http://bsd.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=106258&cid=9049422
but it suggest, that Linux' stack having no BSD like mbuf functionality,
is not perfect for fast transmission. Maybe some network guru
cna comment ?

-- 
Tomasz Torcz       ,,(...) today's high-end is tomorrow's embedded processor.''
zdzichu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                      -- Mitchell Blank on LKML


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>