netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [BK-PATCH 2.4] IPV6: ensure to evaluate checksum

To: yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [BK-PATCH 2.4] IPV6: ensure to evaluate checksum
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 09:32:07 -0700
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040521.005550.20498276.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
References: <20040520.193312.19702393.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <20040520081421.594c5447.davem@redhat.com> <20040521.005550.20498276.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 21 May 2004 00:55:50 +0900 (JST)
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> In article <20040520081421.594c5447.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Thu, 20 May 2004 
> 08:14:21 -0700), "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> says:
> 
> > I can see both advantages and disadvantages of this
> > behavior.  But what I want to ask is if ipv6 RAW is
> > being different on purpose, for example does the ipv6
> > advanced API specify this perhaps?
> 
> Yes.

Great, I've pulled your 2.4.x raw ipv6 changes into my tree.

Thanks a lot.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>