| To: | Andreas Schwab <schwab@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: MSEC_TO_JIFFIES is messed up... |
| From: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 15 May 2004 20:48:47 -0700 |
| Cc: | "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Davide Libenzi <davidel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <jevfj1nwe1.fsf@sykes.suse.de> |
| References: | <20040512020700.6f6aa61f.akpm@osdl.org> <20040512181903.GG13421@kroah.com> <40A26FFA.4030701@pobox.com> <20040512193349.GA14936@elte.hu> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0405121247011.11950@bigblue.dev.mdolabs.com> <20040512200305.GA16078@elte.hu> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0405121400360.11950@bigblue.dev.mdolabs.com> <20040512213913.GA16658@fieldses.org> <jevfj1nwe1.fsf@sykes.suse.de> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 11:55:18PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Signed integer overflow is undefined in C, so the compiler is > allowed to assume it does not happen. Really? Just because something is undefined assuming it never happens is a bit of a leap of faith IMO. --cw |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Remove auto_irq.c, Jeff Garzik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: MSEC_TO_JIFFIES is messed up..., Paul Wagland |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: MSEC_TO_JIFFIES is messed up..., J. Bruce Fields |
| Next by Thread: | Re: MSEC_TO_JIFFIES is messed up..., Paul Wagland |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |