| To: | Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx (Robert Olsson) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: route cache DoS testing and softirqs |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Thu, 8 Apr 2004 17:29:13 +0400 (MSD) |
| Cc: | dipankar@xxxxxxxxxx, Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx (Robert Olsson), andrea@xxxxxxx (Andrea Arcangeli), davem@xxxxxxxxxx (David S. Miller), kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <16498.43191.733850.18276@robur.slu.se> from "Robert Olsson" at сав 06, 2004 02:55:19 |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > setup. I've done a little experimental patch so *all* softirq's are run via > ksoftirqd. BTW what's about performance in this extremal situation? Also, Robert, let's count the numbers again. With this change you should have latency much less 100msec when priority of ksoftirqd is high. So, rcu problem must be solved at current flow rates. This enforces me to suspect we have another source of overflows. F.e. one silly place could be that you set gc_min_interval via sysctl, which uses second resolution (yup :-(). With one second you get maximal ip_rt_max_size/1 second flow rate, it is _not_ a lot. Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | tc feature request/bounty, alex |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: route cache DoS testing and softirqs, kuznet |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: route cache DoS testing and softirqs, Dipankar Sarma |
| Next by Thread: | Re: route cache DoS testing and softirqs, Robert Olsson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |