netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] Do not include linux/irq.h from linux/netpoll.h

To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>, Ian Campbell <icampbell@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not include linux/irq.h from linux/netpoll.h
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 19:31:12 +0000
In-reply-to: <20040316192247.A7886@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>; from rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk on Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 07:22:47PM +0000
Mail-followup-to: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>, Ian Campbell <icampbell@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1079369568.19012.100.camel@icampbell-debian> <20040316001141.C29594@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20040316192247.A7886@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 07:22:47PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> So how do we solve this problem.  Should I just merge this change and
> ask you to pull it?  I think that's rather impolite though.
> 
> Or should I send a BK cset which removes include/linux/irq.h entirely,
> thereby fixing _my_ problem (though it'll break everyone elses build.) 8)

What about moving it to asm-generic now?  linux/irq.h never was a public
API so the stable API in 2.6 thing doesn't count.  And it's fix the confusing
for real.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>