| To: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: network delay simulation |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 16 Mar 2004 17:50:52 -0800 |
| Cc: | shemminger@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040317000048.10d9f52c.ak@suse.de> |
| References: | <20040316151058.3cc2fa28@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> <20040317000048.10d9f52c.ak@suse.de> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 00:00:48 +0100 Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> wrote: > iirc there was a 2.4 port of NistNet. Porting it to 2.6 is probably > not that much work. nistnet works, but even akpm remembers it as pretty grotty, who knows maybe the most recent 2.4.x variant was much better, but I doubt it. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: network delay simulation, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: network delay simulation, Andi Kleen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: network delay simulation, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: network delay simulation, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |