| To: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [janitor] remove casts in drivers/net/arm/ |
| From: | "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 2 Mar 2004 11:02:37 -0800 |
| Cc: | rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4044D86C.70709@pobox.com> |
| Organization: | OSDL |
| References: | <20040229142516.3d218ed0.rddunlap@osdl.org> <20040229143436.4bb884ee.rddunlap@osdl.org> <20040302121042.A9931@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <4044D86C.70709@pobox.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 13:54:36 -0500 Jeff Garzik wrote:
| Russell King wrote:
| > On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 02:34:36PM -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
| >
| >> drivers/net/arm/am79c961a.c | 18 +++++++++---------
| >> drivers/net/arm/ether1.c | 18 +++++++++---------
| >> drivers/net/arm/ether3.c | 18 +++++++++---------
| >> drivers/net/arm/etherh.c | 4 ++--
| >> 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
| >
| >
| > I think we should really consider using netdev_priv() in all these places
| > so the compiler knows that 'dev' and 'priv' are related.
|
|
| Good point.
I respectfully disagree, but if the maintainter won't merge
them as is, so be it.
I have trouble understanding why this:
return (char *)dev + ((sizeof(struct net_device) + 31) & ~31);
is better than using a structure->field, i.e.,
dev->priv
Can one of you enlighten me?
Using dev->priv shows that 'dev' and 'priv' are related.
--
~Randy
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Submission #3 for S2io 10GbE driver, Jeff Garzik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [janitor] remove casts in drivers/net/arm/, Randy.Dunlap |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [janitor] remove casts in drivers/net/arm/, Russell King |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [janitor] remove casts in drivers/net/arm/, Jeff Garzik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |