| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lec] put back pressure on network stack |
| From: | "chas williams (contractor)" <chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 26 Feb 2004 15:12:19 -0500 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Message from "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> of "Thu, 26 Feb 2004 12:10:36 PST." <20040226121036.7472a38a.davem@redhat.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
i probably managed to combine two patches again. i will get it sorted out. In message <20040226121036.7472a38a.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>,"David S. Miller" writes: >This conflicts with a previous patch you sent me in this group entitled: > >[ATM]: [lec] send queued packets immediately after path switch > >So it fully rejected when I tried to apply this one, it looks to me >like the changes this is trying to add are already in there as a result >of the previous change. > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lec] put back pressure on network stack, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.6: net/core.c should export sysctl_optmem_max for modular IPV6, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lec] put back pressure on network stack, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH][ATM]: [lec] put back pressure on network stack, chas williams (contractor) |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |