| To: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Increase snd/rcv buffers in pppoe |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:22:14 -0800 |
| Cc: | ak@xxxxxx, ak@xxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040226220316.GA56782@colin2.muc.de> |
| References: | <20040223105359.GA91938@colin2.muc.de> <20040223.200101.39143636.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <20040223111659.GB10681@colin2.muc.de> <20040223.203843.04073965.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <20040223102613.33838132.davem@redhat.com> <20040225211526.74478066.ak@suse.de> <20040223133233.71eecc99.davem@redhat.com> <20040226194900.GA8230@colin2.muc.de> <20040226124245.5b3c77bf.davem@redhat.com> <20040226205220.GA29457@colin2.muc.de> <20040226220316.GA56782@colin2.muc.de> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On 26 Feb 2004 23:03:16 +0100 Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> wrote: > > I will test now if your change really fixes the DSL performance problem. > > It seems to, but I guess that was by accident. Nope, fully intentional. It should end up doing the same thing your original patch did, check the send buffer size the pppoe socket gets :) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] proportional share accept(), Ronghua Zhang |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.4.26-pre1: SCTP compile error, Sridhar Samudrala |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Increase snd/rcv buffers in pppoe, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Tuning e1000 driver to avoid interface lock down, Kiran Kiran |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |