netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lec] put back pressure on network stack

from [David S. Miller] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: chas3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lec] put back pressure on network stack
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 12:10:36 -0800
Cc: chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200402252354.i1PNs8g5006332@ginger.cmf.nrl.navy.mil>
References: <200402252354.i1PNs8g5006332@ginger.cmf.nrl.navy.mil>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 18:54:09 -0500
"chas williams (contractor)" <chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> backport of similar patch for 2.6.  
> 
> please apply to 2.4 -- thanks
 ...
> # [ATM]: [lec] put back pressure on network stack

This conflicts with a previous patch you sent me in this group entitled:

[ATM]: [lec] send queued packets immediately after path switch

So it fully rejected when I tried to apply this one, it looks to me
like the changes this is trying to add are already in there as a result
of the previous change.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lec] send queued packets immediately after path switch, David S. Miller
Next by Date:  Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lec] put back pressure on network stack, chas williams (contractor)
Previous by Thread:  [PATCH][ATM]: [lec] put back pressure on network stack, chas williams (contractor)
Next by Thread:  Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lec] put back pressure on network stack, chas williams (contractor)
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]