| To: | ak@xxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Increase snd/rcv buffers in pppoe |
| From: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 23 Feb 2004 20:38:43 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | davem@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, mostrows@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040223111659.GB10681@colin2.muc.de> |
| Organization: | USAGI Project |
| References: | <20040223105359.GA91938@colin2.muc.de> <20040223.200101.39143636.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <20040223111659.GB10681@colin2.muc.de> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In article <20040223111659.GB10681@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at 23 Feb 2004 12:16:59 +0100,Mon, 23 Feb 2004 12:16:59 +0100), Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> says: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 08:01:01PM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ > wrote: > > In article <20040223105359.GA91938@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at 23 Feb 2004 11:53:59 > > +0100,Mon, 23 Feb 2004 11:53:59 +0100), Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> says: > > > > > -#define SK_WMEM_MAX 65535 > > > -#define SK_RMEM_MAX 65535 > > > +#define SK_WMEM_MAX 131072 > > > +#define SK_RMEM_MAX 131072 > > > > 131071? > > Probably, but it doesn't make any difference; see how the skbuff socket > accounting works. Really there isn't really a need to make it power > of two (except for mystifying arbitary magic numbers for the users ;-) > 130000 or 200000 would do as well. But, others use (2^n - 1) and people will be confused if there are both 131071 and 131072. --yoshfuji |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Increase snd/rcv buffers in pppoe, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] detailled bcm help-2.4.25, Xose Vazquez Perez |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Increase snd/rcv buffers in pppoe, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Increase snd/rcv buffers in pppoe, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |