netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [PATCH,RFC] [NET] ALIGN

from [David S. Miller] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH,RFC] [NET] ALIGN
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:42:24 -0800
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040210.130543.130923643.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
References: <20040209.134528.28683257.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <20040209112007.08023ba6.davem@redhat.com> <20040210.130543.130923643.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 13:05:43 +0900 (JST)
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> In article <20040209112007.08023ba6.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Mon, 9 Feb 2004 
> 11:20:07 -0800), "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> says:
> 
> > I think this is complete nonsense, and that the alignment is not
> > necessary.  I can't even come up with a performance reason as SLAB
> > is going to align things to hw cache line size anyways.
> 
> Agreed.

Patch applied, arigato Yoshfuji-san.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  [Patch] Netlink BUG() on AMD64, Jan Kasprzak
Next by Date:  Re: some bluetooth fixes, Marcel Holtmann
Previous by Thread:  Re: [PATCH,RFC] [NET] ALIGN, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
Next by Thread:  TProxy, 2.4 Kernel and NetFilter, Jambunathan Kalyanasundaram
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]