netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

[PATCH] IPV6: spelling correction

To: davem@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PATCH] IPV6: spelling correction
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 03:28:02 +0900 (JST)
Cc: yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Organization: USAGI Project
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hello.

D: spelling correction for net/ipv6
D: This patch also removes some XXX.

Thanks.

===== net/ipv6/addrconf.c 1.91 vs edited =====
--- 1.91/net/ipv6/addrconf.c    Tue Feb  3 03:31:58 2004
+++ edited/net/ipv6/addrconf.c  Wed Feb 11 02:11:58 2004
@@ -1071,7 +1071,7 @@
                eui[0] ^= 2;
                return 0;
        case ARPHRD_ARCNET:
-               /* XXX: inherit EUI-64 fro mother interface -- yoshfuji */
+               /* XXX: inherit EUI-64 from other interface -- yoshfuji */
                if (dev->addr_len != ARCNET_ALEN)
                        return -1;
                memset(eui, 0, 7);
===== net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c 1.22 vs edited =====
--- 1.22/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c     Sun Jan 25 03:09:52 2004
+++ edited/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c   Wed Feb 11 02:30:58 2004
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@
 
 /*
  *     A routing update causes an increase of the serial number on the
- *     afected subtree. This allows for cached routes to be asynchronously
+ *     affected subtree. This allows for cached routes to be asynchronously
  *     tested when modifications are made to the destination cache as a
  *     result of redirects, path MTU changes, etc.
  */
===== net/ipv6/exthdrs.c 1.16 vs edited =====
--- 1.16/net/ipv6/exthdrs.c     Mon Feb  9 05:54:02 2004
+++ edited/net/ipv6/exthdrs.c   Wed Feb 11 02:30:29 2004
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@
                        for (curr=procs; curr->type >= 0; curr++) {
                                if (curr->type == skb->nh.raw[off]) {
                                        /* type specific length/alignment 
-                                          checks will be perfomed in the 
+                                          checks will be performed in the 
                                           func(). */
                                        if (curr->func(skb, off) == 0)
                                                return 0;
===== net/ipv6/ndisc.c 1.71 vs edited =====
--- 1.71/net/ipv6/ndisc.c       Tue Feb 10 04:13:09 2004
+++ edited/net/ipv6/ndisc.c     Wed Feb 11 02:12:13 2004
@@ -747,7 +747,7 @@
                        return;
                }
 
-               /* XXX: RFC2461 7.1.1:
+               /* RFC2461 7.1.1:
                 *      If the IP source address is the unspecified address, 
                 *      there MUST NOT be source link-layer address option 
                 *      in the message.
@@ -1195,7 +1195,7 @@
                return;
        }
 
-       /* XXX: RFC2461 8.1: 
+       /* RFC2461 8.1: 
         *      The IP source address of the Redirect MUST be the same as the 
current
         *      first-hop router for the specified ICMP Destination Address.
         */
===== net/ipv6/raw.c 1.48 vs edited =====
--- 1.48/net/ipv6/raw.c Thu Jan 29 09:06:25 2004
+++ edited/net/ipv6/raw.c       Wed Feb 11 02:39:30 2004
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@
                }
                
                /* ipv4 addr of the socket is invalid.  Only the
-                * unpecified and mapped address have a v4 equivalent.
+                * unspecified and mapped address have a v4 equivalent.
                 */
                v4addr = LOOPBACK4_IPV6;
                if (!(addr_type & IPV6_ADDR_MULTICAST)) {
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@
  *     This is next to useless... 
  *     if we demultiplex in network layer we don't need the extra call
  *     just to queue the skb... 
- *     maybe we could have the network decide uppon a hint if it 
+ *     maybe we could have the network decide upon a hint if it 
  *     should call raw_rcv for demultiplexing
  */
 int rawv6_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
@@ -627,7 +627,7 @@
 
        if (ipv6_addr_any(daddr)) {
                /* 
-                * unspecfied destination address 
+                * unspecified destination address 
                 * treated as error... is this correct ?
                 */
                fl6_sock_release(flowlabel);
===== net/ipv6/route.c 1.63 vs edited =====
--- 1.63/net/ipv6/route.c       Sun Jan 25 03:09:52 2004
+++ edited/net/ipv6/route.c     Wed Feb 11 02:38:57 2004
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@
                        match = sprt;
                        mpri = m;
                        if (m >= 12) {
-                               /* we choose the lastest default router if it
+                               /* we choose the last default router if it
                                 * is in (probably) reachable state.
                                 * If route changed, we should do pmtu
                                 * discovery. --yoshfuji
===== net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c 1.16 vs edited =====
--- 1.16/net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c  Thu Jan 22 15:38:40 2004
+++ edited/net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c        Wed Feb 11 02:37:02 2004
@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@
        __u16 len;
 
        /* If the packet doesn't contain the original IPv6 header we are 
-          in trouble since we might need the source address for furter 
+          in trouble since we might need the source address for further 
           processing of the error. */
 
        read_lock(&ip6ip6_lock);

-- 
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF  80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>