| To: | trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [NFS] [PATCH][RFC] use completions instead of sleep_on forrpciod |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 9 Feb 2004 13:00:36 -0800 |
| Cc: | okir@xxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <35059.80.213.3.64.1076359739.squirrel@webmail.uio.no> |
| References: | <20040207144405.GA19416@lst.de> <20040209102801.GC21364@suse.de> <35059.80.213.3.64.1076359739.squirrel@webmail.uio.no> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004 21:48:59 +0100 (CET) trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > I'll admit that the rpciod killer code is racy, but I'm not sure that > completions are the best answer, as they have at least one nasty feature: > they are not interruptible. Would you like to back out the change then? I put it into Linus's tree already. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [BK PATCH] 2.6.2 SCTP updates, Nivedita Singhvi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Change proxy_arp to respond only for valid neighbours, James Morris |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [NFS] [PATCH][RFC] use completions instead of sleep_on forrpciod, trond . myklebust |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [NFS] [PATCH][RFC] use completions instead of sleep_on forrpciod, Olaf Kirch |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |