| To: | Sridhar Samudrala <sri@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [BK PATCH] 2.6.2 SCTP updates |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 8 Feb 2004 10:39:21 -0800 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402080900450.25152@localhost.localdomain> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402061649001.10831@localhost.localdomain> <20040206194518.56787717.davem@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402080900450.25152@localhost.localdomain> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 09:07:48 -0800 (PST) Sridhar Samudrala <sri@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I guess i was influenced by the TCP specific tcp_rmem/tcp_wmem. But TCP > seems to be using them as a vector of 3 values and tuning the buffer sizes > dynamically based on these values. > As of now, SCTP doesn't do any tuning dynamically so i could have used the > core rmem_default/wmem_default. > > Do you want me to remove the specialized SCTP sysctl's? It seems as duplication if there is no specific need to have seperate controls right? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [BK PATCH] 2.6.2 SCTP updates, Sridhar Samudrala |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Change proxy_arp to respond only for valid neighbours, Julian Anastasov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [BK PATCH] 2.6.2 SCTP updates, Sridhar Samudrala |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [BK PATCH] 2.6.2 SCTP updates, Sridhar Samudrala |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |