| To: | Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PROBLEM] r8169 deadlocks |
| From: | Srihari Vijayaraghavan <harisri@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 22 Jan 2004 21:32:06 +1100 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040122005940.A26438@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> |
| References: | <200401152039.00182.harisri@bigpond.com> <200401212115.45027.harisri@bigpond.com> <20040122005940.A26438@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.5.4 |
Hello Francois, On Thursday 22 January 2004 10:59, Francois Romieu wrote: > [...] > r8169 did not evolve between 2.6.1 and 2.6.2-rc1. Change of behavior > probably comes from some other part of the kernel. Joy. > > > If you want me to I can test your r8169-tc-index-overflow.patch. > > See attachment. It applies against plain 2.6.2-rc1. OK. I have applied your patch and I have tested my computer under moderate to high network load. Although I may not have the kind of network load to trigger the bug your patch is meant to attack, I can confirm there is no stability issue with your patch. Thanks Hari |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] IPv6: strict address checks even on globals in ndisc, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH|RFC] IPv6: Equal behavior in addrconf_sysctl_forward() and addrconf_sysctl_forward_strategy(), Ville Nuorvala |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PROBLEM] r8169 deadlocks, Francois Romieu |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] IPV6: added sysctl for maximum number of addresses, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |