Hello Francois,
On Wednesday 21 January 2004 07:52, Francois Romieu wrote:
> [snip]
> $ cat>foo<<EOD
> tar jxf linux-2.6.0.tar.bz2
> bunzip2 -c patch-2.6.1.bz2 | patch -p1 -d linux-2.6.0
> bunzip2 -c patch-2.6.1-bk2.bz2 | patch -p1 -d linux-2.6.0
> bunzip2 -c 2.6.1-bk1-netdev4.patch.bz2 | patch -p1 -d linux-2.6.0
> wget
> http://www.fr.zoreil.com/people/francois/misc/r8169-tx-index-overflow.patch
> EOD
> $ sh foo
> [...]
> $ patch -p1 -d linux-2.6.0 < r8169-tx-index-overflow.patch
> patching file drivers/net/r8169.c
>
> Okay...
>
> $ md5sum r8169-tx-index-overflow.patch
> 99b2f5886d6bf1d4df0f7553bb5bef57 r8169-tx-index-overflow.patch
>
> [...]
Must be my mistake. Thanks for verifying things.
> I did :o)
>
> ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
> <harisri@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> (reason: 554 recipient <harisri@xxxxxxxxxxx> exceeds mailbox storage
> quota)
:-) I apologies for that. God save me from the Spammers!
> > under 32 bit kernel (vanilla Fedora + 2.6.1-mm4) in which it survives my
> > torture test (I have verified for no more than 5 minutes though, but then
> > it does not survive for more than 5 secs under the 64 bit kernel).
>
> Point taken.
I have a good news: I checked out things as usual under vanilla
linux-2.6.2-rc1, and to my surprise Kernel does not hang anymore :-).
(although Tx counter not incrementing is altogether another problem).
If you want me to I can test your r8169-tc-index-overflow.patch.
Thanks
Hari
|