netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PROBLEM] r8169 deadlocks

To: Srihari Vijayaraghavan <harisri@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PROBLEM] r8169 deadlocks
From: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 00:24:22 +0100
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200401192251.41323.harisri@bigpond.com>; from harisri@bigpond.com on Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 10:51:41PM +1100
References: <200401152039.00182.harisri@bigpond.com> <20040115220827.A22007@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <200401192251.41323.harisri@bigpond.com>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
Srihari Vijayaraghavan <harisri@xxxxxxxxxxx> :
[vmstat 1 output]

Ok, mostly idle.

[...]
> > You can try 2.6.1-bk2 + Jeff Garzik's -netdev4 +
> > http://www.fr.zoreil.com/people/francois/misc/r8169-tx-index-overflow.patch
> 
> The r8169-tc-index-overflow.patch does not (cleanly) apply on 2.6.1-bk2 + 
> netdev4.

Can you verify that your kernel tree is fine or give an (sh-)history of
the applied patches ?

I have just checked and the patch applies cleanly on kernel 2.6.1-bk2 +
Jeff's 2.6.1-bk1-netdev4 as well as on kernel 2.6.1-bk4 + Jeff's
2.6.1-bk4-netdev1. 

--
Ueimor

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>