| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Add 32bit emulation for wireless |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 19 Jan 2004 21:50:16 +0100 |
| Date: | Mon, 19 Jan 2004 21:50:16 +0100 |
| Cc: | jt@xxxxxxxxxx, jt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040119122657.3b432583.davem@redhat.com> |
| References: | <20040119123945.A32623@infradead.org> <20040119141041.2cccbc3d.ak@suse.de> <20040119055615.4380e157.davem@redhat.com> <20040119153919.14102937.ak@suse.de> <20040119063921.586b37ac.davem@redhat.com> <20040119155412.2bffee5a.ak@suse.de> <20040119194943.GA9360@bougret.hpl.hp.com> <20040119210132.0c52df58.ak@suse.de> <20040119201912.GA9701@bougret.hpl.hp.com> <20040119122657.3b432583.davem@redhat.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
> 1) they're a lot faster than their 64-bit counterparts > > 2) they're a lot smaller than their 64-bit counterparts > > 3) 64-bits buys them absolutely nothing Just for the record: this doesn't apply to AMD64. While data structures take a bit more memory at runtime the 64bit code is a lot better due to more registers and better ABI. And it is also not signifcantly bigger, in fact some programs get smaller when you recompile them for 64bit. Still good 32bit emulation is important because people expect 32bit applications to run seamlessly on 64bit kernels. > Therefore the 32-bit compatability layer must be as fully supportive as > humanly > possible. Most 64-bit platforms still have %99 32-bit distributions. AMD64 should usually run with 64bit userland, except for user who transistion slowly from a 32bit user land. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Add 32bit emulation for wireless, Jean Tourrilhes |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Add 32bit emulation for wireless, Jean Tourrilhes |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Add 32bit emulation for wireless, Jean Tourrilhes |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Hot-plug for pcnet32 ?, Don Fry |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |