OK, I can reproduce this oops now.
0xc0126f7d in register_proc_table (table=0xc04cc80c, root=0xcff92600) at
string.h:182
182 __asm__ __volatile__(
(gdb) bt
#0 0xc0126f7d in register_proc_table (table=0xc04cc80c, root=0xcff92600) at
string.h:182
#1 0xc0126fcb in register_proc_table (table=0xc04cd540, root=0xcff92680) at
sysctl.c:1187
#2 0xc0126fcb in register_proc_table (table=0xc04cf624, root=0xcff95680) at
sysctl.c:1187
#3 0xc0126fcb in register_proc_table (table=0xc0451958, root=0xcffa0380) at
sysctl.c:1187
#4 0xc051f727 in sysctl_init () at sysctl.c:854
#5 0xc0105169 in init (unused=0x0) at init/main.c:557
(gdb) f 3
#3 0xc0126fcb in register_proc_table (table=0xc0451958, root=0xcffa0380) at
sysctl.c:1187
1187 register_proc_table(table->child, de);
(gdb) p *table
$1 = {ctl_name = 3, procname = 0xc043394e "net", data = 0x0, maxlen = 0, mode =
365, child = 0xc04cf5a0,
proc_handler = 0, strategy = 0, de = 0xcff95680, extra1 = 0x0, extra2 = 0x0}
(gdb) f 2
#2 0xc0126fcb in register_proc_table (table=0xc04cf624, root=0xcff95680) at
sysctl.c:1187
1187 register_proc_table(table->child, de);
(gdb) p *table
$2 = {ctl_name = 12, procname = 0xc0431b88 "ipv6", data = 0x0, maxlen = 0, mode
= 365,
child = 0xc04cd540, proc_handler = 0, strategy = 0, de = 0xcff92680, extra1 =
0x0, extra2 = 0x0}
(gdb) f 1
#1 0xc0126fcb in register_proc_table (table=0xc04cd540, root=0xcff92680) at
sysctl.c:1187
1187 register_proc_table(table->child, de);
(gdb) p *table
$3 = {ctl_name = 18, procname = 0xc0431402 "route", data = 0x0, maxlen = 0,
mode = 365,
child = 0xc04cc680, proc_handler = 0, strategy = 0, de = 0xcff92600, extra1 =
0x0, extra2 = 0x0}
(gdb) f 0
#0 0xc0126f7d in register_proc_table (table=0xc04cc80c, root=0xcff92600) at
string.h:182
182 __asm__ __volatile__(
(gdb) p *table
$4 = {ctl_name = 1220, procname = 0x927c0 <Address 0x927c0 out of bounds>, data
= 0x9, maxlen = 60000,
mode = 500, child = 0x1000, proc_handler = 0, strategy = 0, de = 0x0, extra1
= 0x0, extra2 = 0x0}
It seems that ipv6 is registering something under /proc/net/ipv6/route
which has a bad ctl_table.procname. I don't know what it is - the ipv6
sysctl code overpowered my attention span.
The .config is attached - 2.6.1-mm4 should demonstrate the problem.
Can one of the ip6 guys please look at this?
.config
Description: Binary data
|