| To: | maximilian attems <janitor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 1/5] tun check error on memcpy_fromiovec |
| From: | Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:45:12 -0800 |
| Cc: | Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20031219103457.GD1213@mail.sternwelten.at>; from janitor@sternwelten.at on Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 11:34:58AM +0100 |
| References: | <20031208202302.C30587@build.pdx.osdl.net> <20031219103457.GD1213@mail.sternwelten.at> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
* maximilian attems (janitor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > hey chris, > > after applying your 4 patches on top of linux-2.6.0 > + experimental net, > found 2 last unchecked memcpy_fromiovec in tun.c > patch bellow fixes the second call, > the first is beyond me, please complete this patch :) > compile tested I specifically left those alone. They have a semi-bogus verify_area() call that is trying to insure the memcpy_fromiovec won't EFAULT. I'd prefer to remove them and simply do memcpy checking. thanks, -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] (4/4) support large number of network devices -- alloc_name bitmap, Stephen Hemminger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PROBLEM] r8169 deadlocks, Srihari Vijayaraghavan |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] (1/4) support large number of network devices, Stephen Hemminger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/5] tun check error on memcpy_fromiovec, Max Krasnyansky |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |