| To: | Shirley Ma <xma@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6RouterAdvert netlink notification |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 16 Jan 2004 12:08:35 -0800 |
| Cc: | yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mashirle@xxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <OF6E7E4DFA.6824D151-ON87256E1D.006A89B5@us.ibm.com> |
| References: | <OF6E7E4DFA.6824D151-ON87256E1D.006A89B5@us.ibm.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:41:59 -0800 Shirley Ma <xma@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Does netlink support user-user communication? Yes, it does. One thing I want people to keep in mind in these discussions, while I understand the concerns being addressed and discussed, I think it would be somewhat rediculious for one to be required to go to multiple places just to put a complete ipv6 mib together. For example, a bunch of procfs files, some netlink stuff, and some status files emitted by some userlevel daemon. This is the situation I'd like to see avoided. It looks like we can push all of this stuff over netlink, which would be ideal. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Stale Filehandles was: [2.6] nfs_rename: target $file busy, d_count=2, Mike Fedyk |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6RouterAdvert netlink notification, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6RouterAdvert netlink notification, Shirley Ma |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6RouterAdvert netlink notification, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |