netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH|RFC] IPv6 netfilter: a module for complete proxy ND support

To: vnuorval@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH|RFC] IPv6 netfilter: a module for complete proxy ND support
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 00:01:17 +0900 (JST)
Cc: netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401151537000.29722@rhea.tcs.hut.fi>
Organization: USAGI Project
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401141726490.24125@rhea.tcs.hut.fi> <20040115.223430.100570163.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401151537000.29722@rhea.tcs.hut.fi>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
In article <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401151537000.29722@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Thu, 15 Jan 
2004 16:53:42 +0200 (EET)), Ville Nuorvala <vnuorval@xxxxxxxxxx> says:

> On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [iso-2022-jp] µÈÆ£±ÑÌÀ wrote:
> 
> > In article <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401141726490.24125@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Thu, 15 
> > Jan 2004 15:00:24 +0200 (EET)), Ville Nuorvala <vnuorval@xxxxxxxxxx> says:
> >
> > > On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [iso-2022-jp] µÈÆ£±ÑÌÀ wrote:
> > >
> > > > I don't think so. Proxy should not depend on netfilter.
> > :
> > > There aren't that many ways of doing this "hack" cleanly.
> >
> > Well...
> >
> > We (or only me?) might have mis-understood the "proxy" in Linux :-P
> > It is not for proxy in rfc2461, is it?
> > It is for proxy in Thaler's draft, isn't it?
> 
> No, it's for the proxy go old proxy in rfc2461 :(

Really? I doubt that because of usage and comment in net/ipv4.

--yoshfuji

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>