| To: | James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] IPv4 Netfilter hook priorities for SELinux |
| From: | Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 6 Jan 2004 20:13:11 +0100 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Xine.LNX.4.44.0401061046390.7530-100000@thoron.boston.redhat.com> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Xine.LNX.4.44.0401061046390.7530-100000@thoron.boston.redhat.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 11:01:03AM -0500, James Morris wrote: > Does anyone have any objections to the patch below (which I'd propose for > 2.6.2), or other comments? Thanks James, I am perfectly fine with your patch. Feel free to put them into netfilter_arp.h and netfilter_ipv6.h, too. > - James -- - Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://www.netfilter.org/ ============================================================================ "Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going on while IP was being designed." -- Paul Vixie
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2.6.0: something is leaking memory, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.6.0: something is leaking memory, Erik Hensema |
| Previous by Thread: | [RFC] IPv4 Netfilter hook priorities for SELinux, James Morris |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC] IPv4 Netfilter hook priorities for SELinux, James Morris |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |