| To: | Amir Noam <amir.noam@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: major bonding bug? |
| From: | Jay Vosburgh <fubar@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 30 Dec 2003 16:03:28 -0800 |
| Cc: | "Jeff Garzik" <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, "Hen, Shmulik" <shmulik.hen@xxxxxxxxx>, "Marom, Noam" <noam.marom@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Message from Amir Noam <amir.noam@intel.com> of "Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:45:14 +0200." <200312301845.14275.amir.noam@intel.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
>> This looks very wrong... bonding mode should be per-interface, not
>> global to the entire driver. What happens when a user wants
>> BOND_MODE_ROUNDROBIN on bond0, and BOND_MODE_TLB on bond1?
>
>We agree that it looks very wrong, and this is in fact one of the
>features we've been working on lately. It is not a trivial fix,
>since, as you've noted, a lot of the code depends on the bond
>settings being global. We plan to start releasing patches to address
>this issue very soon (probably even starting tomorrow).
FWIW, the workaround is to load the bonding module multiple
times (once for each desired mode).
-J
---
-Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, fubar@xxxxxxxxxx
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] [NET] missing sysctl strategy in net/{core,ipv6,appletalk}, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH]sk98lin ethtool support, Mirko Lindner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: major bonding bug?, Amir Noam |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Problem with dev_kfree_skb_any() in 2.6.0, Jeff Garzik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |