| To: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: GRE tunnel keepalive support? |
| From: | Daniel Roesen <dr@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 10 Dec 2003 07:52:58 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <20031209223321.29861dc8.davem@redhat.com>; from davem@redhat.com on Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 10:33:21PM -0800 |
| Mail-followup-to: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <20031210064420.A22481@homebase.cluenet.de> <20031209223321.29861dc8.davem@redhat.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 10:33:21PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > > is anybody aware of anyone implementing keepalives for GRE tunnels? > > I don't want to duplicate efforts... > > > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1838/ > > products_feature_guide09186a0080134a36.html > > Not to my knowledge. It looks like a rather simple mechanism, > and should be easy to code up. Feel free. OK, anything else than "easy" would be out of scope anyway, given significant time constraints and never did any kernel work at all (except some micropatches). Given that there is no documentation whatsoever, I will have to do some reverse engineering though. Best regards, Daniel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Kernel 2.4.22 MLD problems, Takashi Hibi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] option for large routing hash, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: GRE tunnel keepalive support?, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Kernel 2.4.22 MLD problems, Takashi Hibi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |