Re: [RTNETLINK] Provide real oif

[Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 08:51:03AM -0500, jamal wrote:
> 
> I am wondering if they should have been the same resolved 
> cache entry to begin with. i.e the fl->oif should not have 
> been 0 rather the ifindex of eth0.
> Even in the case of multipath routing, you have to wait for 
> the cache to expire before selecting the next one in the slow 
> path; so fl->oif of zero may not be a very useful artifact. 

That would be good.  In fact, I think that's how IPv6 works.

Dave, is this acceptable?
-- 
Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email:  Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt