| To: | Ville Nuorvala <vnuorval@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Autoconfig link-local address on ip6-ip6 tunnel device |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 29 Nov 2003 20:47:01 -0800 |
| Cc: | yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.58.0311281146560.9203@rhea.tcs.hut.fi> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.58.0311051412180.28216@rhea.tcs.hut.fi> <20031125.035531.94714784.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0311271147250.3257@rhea.tcs.hut.fi> <20031127.193910.96333709.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0311281146560.9203@rhea.tcs.hut.fi> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 12:34:12 +0200 (EET) Ville Nuorvala <vnuorval@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [iso-2022-jp] µÈÆ£±ÑÌÀ wrote: > > > In article <Pine.LNX.4.58.0311271147250.3257@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Thu, 27 > > Nov 2003 12:31:58 +0200 (EET)), Ville Nuorvala <vnuorval@xxxxxxxxxx> says: > > > > > here is a new version. I made some other minor changes to it too. > > > > looks fine. > > --yoshfuji > > Hi Dave, Yoshifuji-san is now ok with this patch :) Would you apply it? I thought some more about this and I am realizing this is not a pure bug fix, I am very sure Linus will not take the change. We can hold onto this until 2.6.1, ok? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [XFRM] Handle device down/unregister events, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Problems with e1000 in 2.4.23, Ben Greear |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Autoconfig link-local address on ip6-ip6 tunnel device, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Autoconfig link-local address on ip6-ip6 tunnel device, Pekka Savola |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |