| To: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Level One LXT1001 GE chip |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 28 Nov 2003 02:14:39 +0100 |
| Cc: | davem@xxxxxxxxxx, xose@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1069941123.1027.6.camel@jzny.localdomain> |
| References: | <3FC3FB99.70700@wanadoo.es> <20031127010324.061cac3b.davem@redhat.com> <20031127122021.3ac80a86.ak@suse.de> <20031127122642.046d07ce.ak@suse.de> <1069941123.1027.6.camel@jzny.localdomain> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On 27 Nov 2003 08:52:03 -0500 jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Andi, is this the driver you were playing those neat tricks with > getting rid of some of the nastiness in eth_type_trans()? Yep. I didn't attempt to NAPIize it though. Also it is still somewhat buggy. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Allow multiple dummy devices again, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2.6]: IPv6: strcpy -> strlcpy, Mitchell Blank Jr |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Level One LXT1001 GE chip, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Level One LXT1001 GE chip, Xose Vazquez Perez |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |