| To: | "Feldman, Scott" <scott.feldman@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: netdev->mem_start, etc |
| From: | "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 25 Nov 2003 09:53:57 -0800 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <C6F5CF431189FA4CBAEC9E7DD5441E0102CBDCF9@orsmsx402.jf.intel.com> |
| Organization: | OSDL |
| References: | <C6F5CF431189FA4CBAEC9E7DD5441E0102CBDCF9@orsmsx402.jf.intel.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 09:50:50 -0800 "Feldman, Scott" <scott.feldman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: | Is there any reason why these fields should be set for a PCI nic driver? | | netdev->mem_start | netdev->mem_end | netdev->base_addr | | They seem to be vestigial. | | (I'm trying to prune a e100/e1000 dependency with a app that's matching | on these fields to figure out PCI device ID). In several drivers mem_start has been overloaded to pass something often called 'options', like media type, connector, auto-negotiate, duplex, etc. settings. -- ~Randy MOTD: Always include version info. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | netdev->mem_start, etc, Feldman, Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 3/3] rx_all e100 patch, Ben Greear |
| Previous by Thread: | netdev->mem_start, etc, Feldman, Scott |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] (1/2) wan/hostess_sv11 -- get rid of mod inc/dec, Stephen Hemminger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |