| To: | "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] enabling netdev boot options (2.6.0-t9) |
| From: | Rask Ingemann Lambertsen <rask@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 9 Nov 2003 11:55:35 +0100 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, saw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20031108204406.5dbbdc87.rddunlap@osdl.org>; from rddunlap@osdl.org on Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 08:44:06PM -0800 |
| References: | <20031108160441.3a0a5505.rddunlap@osdl.org> <20031108204406.5dbbdc87.rddunlap@osdl.org> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 08:44:06PM -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > > Here's an update for 2.6.0-test9. This update adds > dev_alloc_name_lock(), which takes and releases the rtnl lock > to call dev_alloc_name(), so that the caller doesn't have to do that. > > More comments? I don't like that name for the function. dev_alloc_name_lock() makes it natural to think that there is a matching dev_alloc_name_unlock() function which you should call afterwards. How about dev_alloc_name_locked() or dev_alloc_name_with_lock() instead? -- Regards, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Hang in downing interface with IPv6 PRIVACY, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Linux <---> Unixware slow networking with e100, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] enabling netdev boot options (2.6.0-t9), Andrew Morton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] enabling netdev boot options (2.6.0-t9), Randy.Dunlap |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |