netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: changing MTU on b44 breaks eth0

from [David S. Miller] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Pekka Pietikainen <pp@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: changing MTU on b44 breaks eth0
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 13:20:17 -0800
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20031104211937.GA3888@ee.oulu.fi>
References: <1067888106.3366.20.camel@bluez.bueche.ch> <20031103205335.GA7668@ee.oulu.fi> <20031103151618.79704b30.davem@redhat.com> <20031104111555.GA26860@ee.oulu.fi> <20031104091355.70d6a3d1.davem@redhat.com> <20031104211937.GA3888@ee.oulu.fi>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 23:19:37 +0200
Pekka Pietikainen <pp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 09:13:55AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> > free_netdev() is being invoked before the device registration
> > state advanced to NETREG_UNREGISTERED, likely unregister_netdev()
> > has not been called first or a bogus pointer was passed into
> > the routine.
> Ah, like a missing SET_NETDEV_DEV? :-)

Wonderful, Jeff please integrate this b44 patch from Pekka.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: changing MTU on b44 breaks eth0, Pekka Pietikainen
Next by Date:  [Bug 1490] New: _decode_session[46] does not set type or code for ICMP or ICMPv6], Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Previous by Thread:  Re: changing MTU on b44 breaks eth0, Pekka Pietikainen
Next by Thread:  Re: changing MTU on b44 breaks eth0, Jeff Garzik
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]