| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: net/core/flow.c cpu handling? |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 3 Nov 2003 15:11:45 +0000 |
| Cc: | Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, anton@xxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20031101225050.4de96a8b.davem@redhat.com>; from davem@redhat.com on Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 10:50:50PM -0800 |
| References: | <20031102062345.A472E2C0CD@lists.samba.org> <20031101225050.4de96a8b.davem@redhat.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 10:50:50PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > > Very likely, the code is how it is in order to make the > 2.4.x backport of this code and the 2.6.x version as > similar as humanly possible. Well, the current code is wrong for 2.6 and breaks badly for machines with more than 32/64 cpus. -- Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> - Freelance Hacker Contact me for driver hacking and kernel development consulting |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [2.4/2.6 PATCH] Cosmetic IP_VS_INFO fix, Wensong Zhang |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: IPv6 on-link assumption considered harmful, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: net/core/flow.c cpu handling?, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: net/core/flow.c cpu handling?, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |