| To: | Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: net/core/flow.c cpu handling? |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 3 Nov 2003 14:45:21 -0800 |
| Cc: | anton@xxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20031103102829.E1C622C05E@lists.samba.org> |
| References: | <20031101225050.4de96a8b.davem@redhat.com> <20031103102829.E1C622C05E@lists.samba.org> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 21:26:40 +1100 Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In message <20031101225050.4de96a8b.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> you write: > > > > Very likely, the code is how it is in order to make the > > 2.4.x backport of this code and the 2.6.x version as > > similar as humanly possible. > > Hmm, AFAICT the patch I sent should be easier, not harder to backport. > > Anyway, I'm carrying the patch as part of the hotplug CPU patches: we > can discuss it once 2.6.0 is out. I intend to review your patch today, there is no justification for the problems you've pointed out in this code regardless of how difficult or easy fixing it makes a backport. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: changing MTU on b44 breaks eth0, Pekka Pietikainen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [2.4/2.6 PATCH] Cosmetic IP_VS_INFO fix, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: net/core/flow.c cpu handling?, Rusty Russell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: net/core/flow.c cpu handling?, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |