| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: net/core/flow.c cpu handling? |
| From: | Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 03 Nov 2003 21:26:40 +1100 |
| Cc: | anton@xxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Your message of "Sat, 01 Nov 2003 22:50:50 -0800." <20031101225050.4de96a8b.davem@redhat.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In message <20031101225050.4de96a8b.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> you write: > > Very likely, the code is how it is in order to make the > 2.4.x backport of this code and the 2.6.x version as > similar as humanly possible. Hmm, AFAICT the patch I sent should be easier, not harder to backport. Anyway, I'm carrying the patch as part of the hotplug CPU patches: we can discuss it once 2.6.0 is out. Thanks, Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: IPv6 on-link assumption considered harmful, Pekka Savola |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [2.4/2.6 PATCH] Cosmetic IP_VS_INFO fix, Wensong Zhang |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: net/core/flow.c cpu handling?, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: net/core/flow.c cpu handling?, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |