| To: | Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [IPX]: Fix checksum computation. |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 31 Oct 2003 16:25:16 -0800 |
| Cc: | joe@xxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20031031142131.07176dd7.shemminger@osdl.org> |
| References: | <200310312006.h9VK62Hh005910@hera.kernel.org> <1067635446.11564.92.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20031031132331.35a9aaca.davem@redhat.com> <1067637004.11564.98.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20031031135328.2a997f6a.davem@redhat.com> <20031031142131.07176dd7.shemminger@osdl.org> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 14:21:31 -0800 Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Actually, the before the "optimization" went in I did testing between > old 2.4.x and 2.6.x as well as standalone comparisons. The problem is > a compiler screwup, that probably isn't worth investigating further. See Mark Huth's email, I think his analysis is correct and that the two pieces of C code are really doing different things. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [IPX]: Fix checksum computation., Mark Huth |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [IPX]: Fix checksum computation., Joe Perches |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [IPX]: Fix checksum computation., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [IPX]: Fix checksum computation., Mark Huth |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |