| To: | Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [2.4/2.6 PATCHES] Change some ip_fragment checks to help IPVS |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 14 Oct 2003 15:51:52 -0700 |
| Cc: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0310150143460.16055-100000@u.domain.uli> |
| References: | <200310141203.QAA23474@yakov.inr.ac.ru> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0310150143460.16055-100000@u.domain.uli> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 01:55:43 +0300 (EEST) Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> wrote: > One related question: is ip_fragment() backport from 2.6 > to 2.4 planned? No, it only makes sense in the 2.6.x stack. 2.4.x and 2.6.x networking are wildly different beasts and you'll therefore need to make the IPVS implementation cope with that in each tree. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [2.4/2.6 PATCHES] Change some ip_fragment checks to help IPVS, Julian Anastasov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] (05/12) Probe2 -- ni5010, Stephen Hemminger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [2.4/2.6 PATCHES] Change some ip_fragment checks to help IPVS, Julian Anastasov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [2.4/2.6 PATCHES] Change some ip_fragment checks to help IPVS, Julian Anastasov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |