[Top] [All Lists]

Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7)

To: Elmer <elmer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7)
From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 07:49:29 -0700
Cc: noah@xxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0310131328400.21697-100000@server>
Organization: OSDL
References: <> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0310131328400.21697-100000@server>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 13:31:30 +0200 (EET) Elmer <elmer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

| arlan.c is ok without arlan-proc.c
| as init_arlan_proc is in arlan-proc.c, it shoult be
| OK, as long as radio parameters are saved into cards ROM.
| I have forgot a lot about that code, of course.

Hi Elmer,
Sure, I understand the last comment.

I don't quite understand the first paragraph though.
Could we try again?

Currently arlan.c + arlan-proc.c does not build if CONFIG_PROC_FS=n.
The Makefile always builds arlan-main.o and arlan-proc.o.
Are you saying that this is incorrect?
Should arlan-proc.o only be built/used when CONFIG_PROC_FS=y?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>