netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7)

To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7)
From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 20:24:33 -0700
Cc: davem@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20031011194008.GA2395@mars.ravnborg.org>
Organization: OSDL
References: <20031010141646.779f10bb.rddunlap@osdl.org> <20031011120852.13fa8ec4.davem@redhat.com> <20031011194008.GA2395@mars.ravnborg.org>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 21:40:08 +0200 Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

| On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 12:08:52PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
| > On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 14:16:46 -0700
| > "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
| > 
| > > http://developer.osdl.org/rddunlap/patches/atmprocfs_260t7.patch
| > 
| > How can this be needed?  When procfs is disabled then
| > remove_proc_entry() is defined as "do { } while (0)", ie. a nop.
| 
| Due to this - the real offender:
| 
| from: net/atm/clip.c:
| #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
| #include <linux/proc_fs.h>
| #include <linux/seq_file.h>
| #endif

ugh, thanks.

--
~Randy

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>