netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7)

To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7)
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:40:25 -0700
Cc: rddunlap@xxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20031011194008.GA2395@mars.ravnborg.org>
References: <20031010141646.779f10bb.rddunlap@osdl.org> <20031011120852.13fa8ec4.davem@redhat.com> <20031011194008.GA2395@mars.ravnborg.org>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 21:40:08 +0200
Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Due to this - the real offender:
> 
> from: net/atm/clip.c:
> #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> #include <linux/proc_fs.h>
> #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> #endif

That makes a whole lot more sense, here is the fix I just
checked in:

# This is a BitKeeper generated patch for the following project:
# Project Name: Linux kernel tree
# This patch format is intended for GNU patch command version 2.5 or higher.
# This patch includes the following deltas:
#                  ChangeSet    1.1352  -> 1.1353 
#             net/atm/clip.c    1.26    -> 1.27   
#
# The following is the BitKeeper ChangeSet Log
# --------------------------------------------
# 03/10/11      davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx    1.1353
# [ATM]: Kill PROC_FS ifdef around includes.
# --------------------------------------------
#
diff -Nru a/net/atm/clip.c b/net/atm/clip.c
--- a/net/atm/clip.c    Sat Oct 11 12:43:12 2003
+++ b/net/atm/clip.c    Sat Oct 11 12:43:12 2003
@@ -24,10 +24,8 @@
 #include <linux/if.h> /* for IFF_UP */
 #include <linux/inetdevice.h>
 #include <linux/bitops.h>
-#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
 #include <linux/proc_fs.h>
 #include <linux/seq_file.h>
-#endif
 #include <net/route.h> /* for struct rtable and routing */
 #include <net/icmp.h> /* icmp_send */
 #include <asm/param.h> /* for HZ */

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>