netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] (resend) fix sock_raw behaviour

To: "David S . Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] (resend) fix sock_raw behaviour
From: Jeroen Vreeken <pe1rxq@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:21:57 +0200
Cc: linux-hams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20031009235338.7335b635.davem@redhat.com>; from davem@redhat.com on Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 08:53:38 +0200
References: <20031008235150.A207@jeroen.pe1rxq.ampr.org> <20031009235338.7335b635.davem@redhat.com>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On 2003.10.10 08:53:38 +0200 David S. Miller wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 23:51:50 +0200
> Jeroen Vreeken <pe1rxq@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > This is a resend of a patch from some weeks ago that doesn't appear to
> have
> > made it in yet...
> 
> It doesn't apply, that's why.  You patch ax25.h twice the same
> exact way which causes the patch to not apply.

I seem to have pasted that part twice...
Attached is a corrected version
 
> While we're talking about this, who is going to maintain AX25
> in 2.6.x?  I don't want to be taking bug fixes and other changes
> to AX25 from random people, I'd like to have a single contact
> that will review the AX25 patches from other people and then
> forward them off to me.

The official maintainer for ax25 and netrom is Ralf Baechle. but he seems
to have some problems fitting it into his schedule....

Jeroen

Attachment: sock-raw.diff
Description: Binary data

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>