| To: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Implementation for IPv6 MIB:ipv6AddressTable |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 7 Oct 2003 04:12:46 -0700 |
| Cc: | mashirle@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200310071116.PAA30760@yakov.inr.ac.ru> |
| References: | <20031007034051.3fcb3218.davem@redhat.com> <200310071116.PAA30760@yakov.inr.ac.ru> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 15:16:20 +0400 (MSD) kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Actually, this does not depend on our implementation. If people implement > a MIB, required precision of these times is prescribed in the rfc. > And this is definitely not jiffies. Right, Shirley what is it? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Implementation for IPv6 MIB:ipv6AddressTable, kuznet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Implementation for IPv6 MIB:ipv6AddressTable, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Implementation for IPv6 MIB:ipv6AddressTable, kuznet |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Implementation for IPv6 MIB:ipv6AddressTable, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |