| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] add rtnl semaphore to linux-atm |
| From: | chas williams <chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 01 Oct 2003 09:07:45 -0400 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Message from "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> of "Wed, 01 Oct 2003 05:42:26 PDT." <20031001054226.126cea7b.davem@redhat.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In message <20031001054226.126cea7b.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>,"David S. Miller" writes: >Although, unless VCC connect can potentially sleep, it might >be better to keep exporting the rwlock and take it as a reader >instead of grabbing the rtnl semaphore. i had initially written it that way but remembered at one point i was going to use the rtnl semaphore to handle this problem. any opinions on what is 'better'? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC] add rtnl semaphore to linux-atm, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC] add rtnl semaphore to linux-atm, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC] add rtnl semaphore to linux-atm, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC] add rtnl semaphore to linux-atm, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |