| To: | chas3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] add rtnl semaphore to linux-atm |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 1 Oct 2003 05:42:26 -0700 |
| Cc: | chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200310011134.h91BYPkT003172@ginger.cmf.nrl.navy.mil> |
| References: | <200310011134.h91BYPkT003172@ginger.cmf.nrl.navy.mil> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 07:34:25 -0400 chas williams <chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > i am thinking about doing the following to fix the race > during ATM_ITF_ANY operation. rtnl is held across > registration/unregistration. this means that you can get > read-only access to the device list by holding rtnl > or a read_lock on atm_dev_lock similar to the scheme > used by netdevice (or so i think). This looks like it would work. Although, unless VCC connect can potentially sleep, it might be better to keep exporting the rwlock and take it as a reader instead of grabbing the rtnl semaphore. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [RFC] add rtnl semaphore to linux-atm, chas williams |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC] add rtnl semaphore to linux-atm, chas williams |
| Previous by Thread: | [RFC] add rtnl semaphore to linux-atm, chas williams |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC] add rtnl semaphore to linux-atm, chas williams |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |